Showing posts with label LAW531. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LAW531. Show all posts

LAW531 Week 5 Learning Team Assignment Week 5 IRAC Brief

The week's assignment concerns briefing a case from the readings. You can pick any case from the readings. You must pick an actual court case and give the citation. The brief should concern a legal case that is relevant to the following Week 5, Agency, Employment and Labor Law, objectives.

 

Brief the case. Use the IRAC methodology. Discuss the:

 

  • I: Issue
  • R: Rule
  • A: Analysis
  • C: Conclusion

 The brief is followed by discussion of whether your team agrees or disagrees with the court opinion.

 The paper is a minimum 1000 words in length

"Waldo's working environment at Consumers was filled with discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult that was sufficient to create a hostile work environment."

—Moore, Circuit Judge

Facts

Theresa Waldo was employed by Consumers Energy Company of Michigan as an electrical line worker, a position that involved working in rural areas with electric lines containing high-voltage current attached to tall steel towers. She was the first woman employed by the company for this position. From the beginning of her employment, she was routinely subjected to sexual harassment. Waldo's male coworkers refused to work with her because she was female, making it clear that women were not welcome at the job. The crew members would not let her use the company truck to drive to find bathrooms to use. Her male coworkers urinated outdoors, and they told her, "You want to work in a man's world, pee like a guy." Waldo's coworkers locked her in a port-a-potty by taping the doors shut. Her coworkers displayed sexually explicit calendars, playing cards, and magazines in the trucks and at her places of work. They threw her purse out the window of a moving truck, excluded her from lunch trips, ostracized and ignored her at job sites, and at times refused to speak to her or work with her. Waldo was repeatedly called derogatory and demeaning names, such as "bitch," "wench," and other gender-specific demeaning language. Waldo reported these instances to her supervisor and to the human resources (HR) department of the company, but the company did not investigate or curb such abuses. Waldo sued Consumers in U.S. district court for sexual harassment in violation of Title VII. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of Waldo, awarding her $400,000 in compensatory damages and $7,500,000 in punitive damages, which the court reduced to $300,000 based on caps on damages established by federal law. The court also awarded $684,000 in attorney's fees and $38,000 for costs and fees. Consumers appealed.

Issue

Is Consumers liable for sexual harassment?

Language of the Court

Based on the totality of evidence presented to the jury, the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the clear weight of the evidence demonstrated that Waldo's working environment at Consumers was filled with discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult that was sufficient to create a hostile work environment. Additionally, it was not an abuse of discretion to find that the clear weight of the evidence demonstrated that Consumers' response to the complaints of harassment was inadequate.

Decision

The U.S. court of appeals affirmed the U.S. district court's finding of sexual harassment and the award of damages, attorney's fee, and costs.

   

LAW531- Week 4 Learning Team Assignment Week 4 IRAC Brief

The week's assignment concerns briefing a case from the readings. You can pick any case from the readings. You must pick an actual court case and give the citation. The brief should concern a legal case that is relevant to the following Week 4, Contracts and Property Law, objectives.

 

Brief the case. Use the IRAC methodology. Discuss the:

 

  • I: Issue
  • R: Rule
  • A: Analysis
  • C: Conclusion

 

 

The brief is followed by discussion of whether your team agrees or disagrees with the court opinion.

 

The paper is a minimum 1000 words in length

 

Ethics Coca-Cola Employee Tries to Sell Trade Secrets to Pepsi-Cola

"What if you knew the markets Coca-Cola was going to move into and out of and beat them to the punch."

—Letter to PepsiCo

PepsiCo received a letter sent to the company by an employee of Coca-Cola Company that offered to sell PepsiCo trade secrets of Coca-Cola. The letter stated, "What if you knew the markets Coca-Cola was going to move into and out of and beat them to the punch." The letter proposed selling trade secrets regarding a proposed Coke product code-named Project Lancelot for $1.5 million.

PepsiCo notified Coca-Cola officials and federal authorities. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) initiated an investigation into the matter. The federal government brought criminal charges against Coca-Cola secretary Joya Williams. During trial, prosecutors produced the letter as well as a video-recording of Williams putting confidential documents and samples of Coke products that were still in development into her bag.

Williams was convicted by a federal jury of conspiring to steal Coca-Cola trade secrets and attempting to sell them to archrival PepsiCo. The trial court judge sentenced Williams to 8 years in jail. The U.S. court of appeals upheld the decision. Two other co-conspirators were arrested and pled guilty. United States v. Williams, 526 F.3d 1312, 2008 U.S. App. Lexis 6073 (United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2008)

 





LAW531 Final Exam (2018) SCORE 100 PERCENT

Question 1
Which of the following applies to trade restraints that are inherently anticompetitive?
The rule of reason
The pro rata rule
The per se rule
The rule of four

Question 2
When one party acquires a license to use another party's business model and intellectual property in the distribution of goods and services, the arrangement is a __________.

    limited liability partnership
    franchise
    joint venture
    Kickback

Question 3
Which of the following is prohibited by the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) with regard to food?

    The sale of adulterated food
    Labeling of genetically engineered food products
    The sale of non-organic food products
    Labeling of raw seafood products

Question 4
The obligation owed by individuals to one another not to cause any unreasonable harm or any risk of harm is called:

    duty of restoration.
    duty of care
    duty of loyalty.
    duty of restitution.

Question 5
When can an arbitrator's decision and award be appealed to the courts?

    While drafting a submission agreement
    When an arbitration is binding
    While entering a negotiation
    When an arbitration is nonbinding

Question 6
Which of the following is an advantage of franchising?

    It enables two businesses to pool their resources to pursue a common goal.
    It allows a business to consist of only general partners.
    It allows businesses to reach profitable new markets.
    It grants free access to the intellectual property of a business to anyone in the same market.

Question 7
Workers' compensation is defined as the:

    system that provides retirement and death benefits to covered employees and their dependents.
    insurance obtained by employees from private insurance companies and government-sponsored programs.
    remuneration awarded to employees and their families when the employees are injured on the job.
    set of programs mandated by the government to ensure safety in places of work.

Question 8
Corporate officers are elected by a corporation's __________.

    owners
    board of directors
    common stockholders
    preferred stockholders

Question 9
Which of the following is a difference between embezzlement and larceny?

    Embezzlement is the snatching of personal property from a person's home, whereas larceny is the snatching of personal property from a person on the street.
    Embezzlement is an unintentional tort, whereas larceny is a nonintent crime.
    Embezzlement is the stealing of property by a person to whom the property was entrusted, whereas larceny is the stealing of property by a person not entrusted with it.
    Embezzlement is usually punishable by the payment of monetary damages, whereas larceny is usually punishable by the death penalty.

Question 10
Which of the following is a criticism of the ethical fundamentalism theory?

    It does not allow people to decide for themselves what is right and what is wrong.
    It is impossible in the real world to expect that everyone in society will obey moral rules.
    It does not reach an agreement on what the universal rules should be.
    It is impossible to measure the "good" that may result from different actions.

Question 11
The manifestation of the substance of a contract by two or more individuals is called __________.

    consideration
    an offer
    acceptance
    an agreement

Question 12
Which of the following is a remedy that requires the breaching party to perform the acts promised in a contract?

    Specific performance
    Binding arbitration
    Punitive damages
    Special damages

Question 13
Laws that prohibit discrimination based on race, gender, or religion in the workplace primarily serve the function of:

    advocating social justice.
    providing a basis for compromise.
    creating a new status quo.
    minimizing the freedom of employees.

Question 14
Which of the following is a difference between arbitration and mediation?

    Arbitration is an informal method of dispute resolution, whereas mediation is a formal method of dispute resolution.
    The decision of an arbitrator is nonbinding, whereas the decision of a mediator is binding.
    The role of an arbitrator is merely to assist parties in reaching a settlement, whereas the role of a mediator is similar to the role of a trial judge.
    An arbitrator is authorized to issue an award, whereas a mediator can only assist in reaching a settlement.

Question 15
Which of the following is a requirement for obtaining a patent for an invention?

    The invention needs to be made of highly valuable components.
    The invention must be in the form of a service.
    The invention must be original.
    The invention needs to be recognizable to the general public.

Question 16
An agency that appears to be created by a principal but does not exist in reality is called a(n) __________.

    apparent agency
    implied agency
    agency by ratification
    fully disclosed agency

Question 17
Laws that protect governments from being overthrown primarily serve the function of:

    advocating social justice
    providing bases for compromise.
    maintaining the status quo.
    minimizing individual freedom.

Question 18
Ken owns a small convenience store in a street corner in California. One afternoon, a teenage boy enters his store, looks around, and prepares to walk out without buying anything. Ken is wary of the boy because of the boy's shabby clothing. He stops and asks the boy to empty his pockets and then questions him for about five minutes. After finding that the boy does not have anything from the store on him, Ken reluctantly lets him go. Which of the following is a merchant protection statute that Ken has violated?

    Reasonable grounds for suspicion
    Reasonable duration of detention
    Adverse possession
    Adequate assurance of performance

Question 19
Corporate officers are best described as:

    directors elected by a corporation's shareholders.
    partners pursuing a joint venture transaction
    owners of a corporation with limited liability for its debts and obligations.
    employees appointed to manage the daily operations of a corporation.

Question 20
Which of the following scenarios is an example of law and ethics contradicting each other?

    A florist in the United States employs an illegal immigrant to help the immigrant and her family overcome their financial difficulties.
    A large apparel retailer copies the trademarked garment designs of a well-known fashion designer.
    A restaurateur, whose restaurant is violating labor laws, bribes a federal official to prevent him from reporting the violations.
    An iron-ore manufacturing company provides its employees with high-quality safety equipment.

Question 21
Robert orders coffee while having breakfast in a diner. He suffers third-degree burn injuries when the coffee accidently spills on him. He presses charges against the diner for failing to notify him that the coffee was exceptionally hot. In this scenario, the diner is guilty of a(n) __________.

    unintentional tort
    intent crime
    intentional tort

Question 22
Which of the following best describes the term warranty?

    It refers to the transfer of possession of stolen property to a person who had bought the property without the knowledge that it has been stolen.
    It is a purchaser's title to goods obtained by the impersonation of another person.
    It refers to the terms in a sales contract stipulating the party that will bear the risk of loss of goods during shipment.
    It is the seller's assurance to a buyer that the goods sold meet certain standards of quality.
    nonintent crime

Question 23
Which of the following is a characteristic of torts?

    They are punishable by the death penalty.
    They are usually not tried by the jury.
    They are brought to court by a plaintiff.
    They are tried by criminal procedure.

Question 24
A group boycott occurs when:

    competitors at one level of distribution collectively refuse to deal with others at a different level of distribution.
    parties enter into a trade agreement that has greater anticompetitive effects than procompetitive effects.
    parties at different levels of distribution enter into an agreement to adhere to a schedule that will stabilize prices.
    competitors agree that they will distribute their goods to only a particular portion of the market.

Question 25
A goal of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is to:

    control and closely monitor the financial accounts of all corporations in the United States.
        allow directors and executive officers of public companies to be given personal loans from the companies.
   
end conflicts of interest, establishing better corporate governance.
   
enable smooth settlement of alleged fraud among major corporations.

Question 26
Helen buys a toy railway set for her 3-year-old son, Ben. The product's cover mentions that the toy is suitable for children only aged between 3 and 12. While playing with the toy one evening, without Helen's supervision, Ben chokes on an inch-long engine driver figure that forms part of the train. Although he survives, he is traumatized by the incident. For which type of defect can Helen sue the toy manufacturer?

    Failure to tamperproof
    Defect in product packaging
    Defect in manufacture
    Failure to warn

Question 27
Insider trading is considered illegal because:

    it results in excessive losses for the company.
    it makes use of nonmaterial public information.
    it fails to account for the short-swing profits brought into a company.
    it limits investment opportunities for the investing public.

Question 28
When an employer does not discriminate against women in general but treats women above the age of 40 differently, the employer is practicing __________.

    color discrimination
    sex-plus discrimination
    religious discrimination
    racial discrimination

Question 29
The power and authority to exclude competition or control prices is known as __________.

    enumerated power
    monopoly power
    implied power
    reserved power

Question 30
Which of the following is a category of torts?
    Professional malpractice
    Personal liability
    Strict liability
    Nonintent crime

      

LAW531 Week 5 Report discussing legal concepts from Brief

Using the same case your team briefed this week, discuss how the legal concepts in the selected case can be applied within a business managerial setting. Give an example from real life experiences or current events. Explain how the rule discussed in the case have impacted the industry in past and what you see for the future. Discuss the positive and negative effect the case law has made on the industry.

(Minimum 1000 words, 3 references)

"Waldo's working environment at Consumers was filled with discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult that was sufficient to create a hostile work environment."

—Moore, Circuit Judge

Facts

Theresa Waldo was employed by Consumers Energy Company of Michigan as an electrical line worker, a position that involved working in rural areas with electric lines containing high-voltage current attached to tall steel towers. She was the first woman employed by the company for this position. From the beginning of her employment, she was routinely subjected to sexual harassment. Waldo's male coworkers refused to work with her because she was female, making it clear that women were not welcome at the job. The crew members would not let her use the company truck to drive to find bathrooms to use. Her male coworkers urinated outdoors, and they told her, "You want to work in a man's world, pee like a guy." Waldo's coworkers locked her in a port-a-potty by taping the doors shut. Her coworkers displayed sexually explicit calendars, playing cards, and magazines in the trucks and at her places of work. They threw her purse out the window of a moving truck, excluded her from lunch trips, ostracized and ignored her at job sites, and at times refused to speak to her or work with her. Waldo was repeatedly called derogatory and demeaning names, such as "bitch," "wench," and other gender-specific demeaning language. Waldo reported these instances to her supervisor and to the human resources (HR) department of the company, but the company did not investigate or curb such abuses. Waldo sued Consumers in U.S. district court for sexual harassment in violation of Title VII. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of Waldo, awarding her $400,000 in compensatory damages and $7,500,000 in punitive damages, which the court reduced to $300,000 based on caps on damages established by federal law. The court also awarded $684,000 in attorney's fees and $38,000 for costs and fees. Consumers appealed.

 

LAW531 Week 3 Learning Team Assignment Week 3 IRAC Brief

The week's assignment concerns briefing a case from the readings. You can pick any case from the readings. You must pick an actual court case and give the citation. The brief should concern a legal case that is relevant to the following Week 3, Torts and Criminal Law, objectives.

 Brief the case. Use the IRAC methodology. Discuss the:

 

  • I: Issue
  • R: Rule
  • A: Analysis
  • C: Conclusion

 The brief is followed by discussion of whether your team agrees or disagrees with the court opinion.

 The paper is a minimum 1000 words in length

Ethics Ouch! McDonald's Coffee Is Too Hot!

McDonald's Corporation found itself embroiled in one of the most famous negligence cases of modern times. Stella Liebeck, a 79-year-old resident of Albuquerque, New Mexico, visited a drive-through window of a McDonald's restaurant with her grandson Chris. Her grandson, the driver of the vehicle, placed the order for breakfast. When breakfast came at the drive-through window, Chris handed a hot cup of coffee to Stella. Chris pulled over so that Stella could put cream and sugar in her coffee. Stella took the lid off the coffee cup she held in her lap and the hot coffee spilled in her lap. The coffee spilled all over Stella, who suffered third-degree burns on her legs, thighs, groin, and buttocks. Stella was driven to the emergency room and was hospitalized for seven days. She required medical treatment and later returned to the hospital to have skin grafts. She suffered permanent scars from the incident.

Stella's medical costs were $11,000. Stella asked McDonald's to pay her $20,000 to settle the case, but McDonald's offered only $800. Stella refused this settlement and sued McDonald's in court for negligence for selling coffee that was too hot and for failing to warn her of the danger of the hot coffee it served. At trial, McDonald's denied that it had been negligent and asserted that Stella's own negligence—opening a hot coffee cup on her lap—had caused her injuries. The jury heard the following evidence:

·         McDonald's enforces a quality-control rule that requires its restaurants and franchises to serve coffee at 180 to 190 degrees Fahrenheit.

·         Third-degree burns occur on skin in just two to five seconds when coffee is served at 185 degrees.

·         McDonald's coffee temperature was 20 degrees hotter than coffee served by competing restaurant chains.

·         McDonald's coffee temperature was approximately 40 to 50 degrees hotter than normal house-brewed coffee.

·         McDonald's had received more than 700 prior complaints of people who had been scalded by McDonald's coffee.

·         McDonald's did not place a warning on its coffee cups to alert patrons that the coffee it served was exceptionally hot.

Based on this evidence, the jury concluded that McDonald's acted recklessly and awarded Stella $200,000 in compensatory damages, which was then reduced by $40,000 because of her own negligence, and $2.7 million in punitive damages. The trial court judge reduced the amount of punitive damages to $480,000, which was three times the amount of compensatory damages. McDonald's now places a warning on its coffee cups that its coffee is hot. Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants, P.T.S., Inc. (New Mexico District Court, Bernalillo County, New Mexico, 1994)


    

LAW531 Week 4 Report discussing legal concepts from Brief

Using the same case your team briefed this week, discuss how the legal concepts in the selected case can be applied within a business managerial setting. Give an example from real life experiences or current events. Explain how the rule discussed in the case have impacted the industry in past and what you see for the future. Discuss the positive and negative effect the case law has made on the industry.

 

The paper is a minimum 1000 words in length

 

Case: Ethics Coca-Cola Employee Tries to Sell Trade Secrets to Pepsi-Cola

 

LAW531 Week 3 Report discussing legal concepts from Brief

Using the same case your team briefed this week, discuss how the legal concepts in the selected case can be applied within a business managerial setting. Give an example from real life experiences or current events. Explain how the rule discussed in the case have impacted the industry in past and what you see for the future. Discuss the positive and negative effect the case law has made on the industry.

(Minimum 1000 words)

Case:  Ethics Ouch! McDonald's Coffee Is Too Hot!

 


LAW531 Week 2 Week 2 Individual Report on Business Forms

Resources: Legal Environment of Business: Online Commerce, Business Ethics, and Global Issues:  Ch. 14, 15, 16 and 17; Week 2 Electronic Reserve Readings; Legal Source database located in the Week 2 Electronic Reserve Readings

Scenario: You are sole proprietor presenting to a group of investors where you are seeking 20 million dollars to raise capital for your manufacturing company.

Prepare a memo discussing the following to investors:

Choose the one form of organization best suited for your manufacturing company and explain why:

  • Partnership
  • Limited Liability Partnership
  • Limited Liability Company (including single member LLC)
  • S Corporation
  • Franchise
  • Corporation

Explain for the investors which form of organization (from the list above) would be the least suited and why?

(The legal form an entity or individual takes is a decision that must be considered from a risk and liability perspective, not simply one of ease of formation or cost. Form can impact the entities ability to grow and, in some circumstances, its ability to survive. As you consider this reality and approach this assignment, consider not only the form the business takes but also the way it will be governed. Remember the law requires business leaders conduct their business ethically and within the boundaries of the law.)   


Summarize for investors what legal liabilities could arise for the Director or officer of that board?
Explain how you could minimize those liabilities for the Director or officer of that board.

A minimum word count of 1000 words is needed.

      

LAW531 Week 1 ADR Clause

Create an ADR clause may be used in any Learning Team throughout the program

The clause should include at least one type of ADR to be used in Learning Teams to resolve disputes.

 The clause will identifies possible learning team disputes that are subject to ADR and should include all provisions necessary to enable ADR to occur.

 Word count - A minimum word count of 500 words



LAW531 Final Exam

 

LAW531 Final Exam

 

1) Which of the following is a distinguishing feature of a common law legal system?

A. Requiring guilt be proven beyond a reasonable doubt

B. The sole source of law is a comprehensive civil code

C. An appeal process

D. The making of law by the judges and the following of precedent

 

2) Which best describes the types of agency authority held by officers of a corporation?

A. Vicarious authority

B. Express and obvious authority

C. Implied and apparent authority only

D. Express, implied, and apparent authority

 

3) If an LLC fails to follow formalities such as keeping minutes of meetings, which of the following is true?

A. Only the managers of a manager-managed LLC will lose limited liability.

B. All members will lose their limited liability.

C. This failure will not result in imposing personal liability on any member.

D. Only the parties responsible for the failure will lose limited liability.

 

4) Martha started a flower shop as a sole proprietor. After 1 year, she was forced to close the shop because business was so bad. At that time, the business assets totaled $50,000, but the business liabilities totaled $125,000. Which of the following statements is true?

A. Martha is personally liable for the additional $75,000.

B. Martha's business creditors can collect only the $50,000 of business assets.

C. Martha's business creditors can collect only the $50,000 now, but if Martha ever goes into business again, they can get the assets of the new business.

D. Once Martha terminates the sole proprietorship; the business creditors cannot even get the $50,000

 

5) Partners of a general partnership

A. Are protected from litigation against the partnership by statute

B. Are liable for the obligations of the partnership only to the extent of their capital contributions

C. Do not have to pay taxes on the profits of the partnership that are distributed to them

D. Are liable for all the obligations of their partnership

 

6) Which of the following forms of alternative dispute resolution allows both parties to see the strengths and weaknesses of both sides of the case through the presentation of evidence?

A. Negotiated settlement

B. Mini-trial

C. Mediation

D. Conciliation

 

7) A ___________ is a court-appointed party who conducts a private trial and renders a judgment

A. Fact-finder

B. Arbitrator

C. Judicial referee

D. Negotiator

 

8) What is a form of alternative dispute resolution that is often used when the parties involved do not want to face one another?

A. Arbitration

B. Fact-finding

C. Mini-trial

D. Conciliation

 

9) Which of the following is true regarding mediation?

A. A mediator often meets with both parties at the same time

B. A settlement agreement is never reached with a mediator.

C. A mediator does not make a decision or award

D. If a settlement agreement is not reached in mediation, then the parties hire a new mediator

 

10) There are no accountants on the board of the Oriole Corporation, a privately held corporation. The board routinely relies on a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) to explain the financial situation of the corporation. Law 531 final exam. The board does not do an independent analysis of the CPA's report. In these circumstances, the board is

A. Violating a duty of loyalty

B. Violating a duty to exercise due care

C. Violating the business judgment rule

D. Not violating any duty

 

11) Self-dealing by a director of a corporation can best be described as

A. A breach of a director's duty of notification

B. A breach of a director's duty of care

C. A breach of the Business Judgment Rule

D. There was no breach of duty

 

12) Which of the following is likely to be a breach of a corporate officer or director's duty of care?

A. Failing to anticipate a precipitous drop in consumer demand of the company's product

B. Failing to make a reasonable investigation of relevant facts

C. Failing to predict the unexpected startup of a new competitor

D. Failing to foresee a sudden rise in the interest rate

 

13) In what ways may officers and directors be protected by the corporation from liability for actions taken as an officer or director?

A. The officer or director must purchase personal liability insurance to cover such losses.

B. Have the corporation purchase liability insurance and indemnify the officers and directors

C. Officers and directors cannot be protected from liability

D. Officers and directors are automatically protected from liability by virtue of corporate

 

 

14) If a plaintiff voluntarily participates in a risky activity that results in injury, what is the most likely defense to a claim that the plaintiff assumed the risk?

A. Contributory negligence

B. Defendant was negligent per se

C. Defendant assumed the risk under the "danger invites rescue" doctrine

D. Comparative negligence

 

15) Mark is the treasurer of Sky-Hi Tech Corporation and, as such, he is responsible for protecting the assets of the corporation. One of Mark's subordinates, Jill, is in charge of reconciling the monthly corporate bank statements. Law/531 week 5 final. Over a period of several months, Jill embezzled a large amount of money from Sky-Hi Tech, covering up the theft using her bank reconciliations. If Mark had adequately supervised Jill, she could not have embezzled this money. Mark's actions (or inactions) constitute a breach of his duty of

A. Due care

B. Obedience

C. Loyalty

D. Good business judgment

 

16) Barry buys a new sports car. The car sits low to the ground and because of the styling; visibility to the rear is limited. About a month after Barry buys the car, he backs over his pet poodle as he is leaving for work. In his strict liability suit against the car manufacturer, Barry will

A. Win because driving a sports car is an inherently dangerous activity

B. Win on the basis of design defect

C. Win on the basis of packaging defect because the car could have been packaged in a differently styled body

D. Lose because he assumed the risk of backing up in a car when he could not see to the rear

 

17) If a judge rules that a party lost its case because of the Statute of Frauds, the judge has essentially stated which of the following?

A. The losing party purposely deceived the other party about a material fact.

B. The losing party will not be allowed to introduce evidence to contradict a written agreement

C. The losing party cannot enforce an oral contract that should have been in writing

D. The losing party was found by the court to have lied, and therefore will lose the case

 

18) What does the parole evidence rule do?

A. It limits the ability of parties to written contracts from introducing certain evidence related to the contract.

B. It sets the rules for admissibility of evidence relating to releasing a criminal from a prison term

C. It sets the general rules for the admissibility of evidence in criminal actions

D. It determines which contracts are required to be in writing

 

19) ABC LLC and XYZ Corp. entered into a contract whereby ABC is to supply XYZ with widgets. After receiving the first shipment of widgets, XYZ finds that the widgets, while meeting the physical standards specified in the contract, do not perform as XYZ anticipated. The contract is silent as to performance specifications, but XYZ suspects that ABC knew that it was manufacturing and supplying widgets that would not perform according to industry standard. XYZ initiates a lawsuit against ABC, alleging that ABC knowingly supplied defective widgets. What process will XYZ use to help it develop its case against ABC?

A. Pleadings

B. Motion for summary judgment

C. Discovery

D. Trial

 

20) Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), an employee's benefits must vest

A. Within 10 years

B. By the time of the employee's retirement

C. In total within 5 years or gradually within 7 years

D. Only as provided in the pension plan

 

21) Which of the following statutes provides that it is legal for employees to organize a union?

A. The Norris-LaGuardia Act

B. The National Labor Relations Act

C. The Labor-Management Relations Act

D. The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act

 

22) William was a factory worker at the Spruce Industries plant. When management found out that William is gay, he was fired. The plant's action is

A. Not prohibited under federal law

B. A violation of Title VII

C. A violation of the Equal Pay Act

D. A violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act

 

23) Janet is manager of a bank. She has all the qualifications to be promoted to bank manager. In fact, she is better qualified than any of the men being considered for the position. However, the owner of the bank believes that bank customers will LAW/531 not accept a woman as bank manager, so the owner promotes one of the males. The owner's actions would best be described as what?

A. Quid pro quo

B. Hostile work environment

C. Gender discrimination

D. Pregnancy discrimination

 

24) Which one of the following statutes allows a prevailing party to recover attorney's fees in an action against the government for an action of an agency?

A. The Freedom of Information Act

B. The Government Compensation Act

C. The Administrative Procedure Act

D. The Equal Access to Justice Act

 

25) Which of the following would prevent someone from acquiring land by adverse possession?

A. The person never had to fight the original owner to remain on the land

B. The person lived on the land secretly so that the original owner would not find out he or she was there

C. The person lived on the land without the original owner's permission

D. The person was the only person who lived on the land in question

 

26) Which of the following would be classified as tangible personal property, as opposed to other property categories, such as fixtures or intangible property?

A. A freestanding desk

B. Built-in cabinets in an office

C. A copyright to a literary work

D. A field of corn

 

27) As the CEO of a high tech company, you become aware that your chief competitor is working on a new computer program that will revolutionize your industry. You know that if you can find out several key functions about the new product, LAW/531 final exams your own programmers will be able to duplicate the function of the program without actually copying its code. Which of the following actions can you ethically take?

A. Paying the garbage company to deliver the competitor's garbage to you

B. Hiring a former employee of the competitor and paying her a bonus to tell you the competitor's secrets

C. Hiring a researcher to review all available information about the competitor, including patents, types and names of employees hired, reports by the competitor, including all SEC filings

D. Hacking into the competitor's computer systems to find out what you need

 

28) From a practical perspective, what are some of the elements of Sarbanes-Oxley?

A. Ensuring transparency, accountability and internal controls

B. Ensuring companies are profitable

C. Ensuring that CEOs do not make more than 10 times the lowest paid employee

D. Ensuring that large shareholders do not have board representation

 

29) Under Title IX of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the penalty for someone who certifies "any statements as set forth in subsections (a) and (b) of this section knowing that the periodic report accompanying the statement does not comport . . ." is. Law 531 final exam answer

A. No more than $1,000,000.00 or imprisoned no more than 10 years, or both

B. No more than $500,000.00 or imprisoned no more than 6 months, or both

C. No more than $2,000,000.00 or imprisoned no more than 3 years, or both

D. No more than $5,000,000.00 or imprisoned no more than 20 years, or both

 

30) Which is prohibited under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act?

A. High salaries for corporate executives

B. Using an independent accounting firm for audit purposes

C. Public companies making personal loans to their directors and executives

D. Directors and executives attending board meetings on a regular basis