C12 All 4 Case Analysis

C12 Case Analysis 1 Option Wireless LTD v. OpenPeak, Inc.

Option Wireless LTD v. OpenPeak, Inc.

Your response should be a minimum of four (4) double-spaced pages; refer to the Length and Formatting instructions below for additional details.

In complete sentences respond to the following prompts:

• Summarize the facts of the case;
• Identify the parties and explain each party's position;
• Outline the case's procedural history including any appeals;
• What is the legal issue in question in this case?
• How did the court rule on the legal issue of this case?
• What facts did the court find to be most important in making its decision?
• Respond to the following questions:
• Are there any situations in which it might be a good idea to include additional or different terms in the "acceptance" without making the acceptance expressly conditional on assent to the additional or different terms?
• Under what conditions can a contract be formed by the parties' conduct? Why wasn't the conduct of the parties here used as the basis for a contract?
• Do you agree or disagree with the court's decision? Provide an explanation for your reasoning either agree or disagree.

 

United States v. Hansen

Click here to access the assigned case.

Be sure to save an electronic copy of your answers before submitting it to Ashworth College for grading.  Unless otherwise stated, you should answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English, spelling, and grammar.  Sources must be cited in APA format.

Your response should be a minimum of four (4) double-spaced pages; refer to the Length and Formatting instructions below for additional details.

In complete sentences respond to the following prompts:

• Summarize the facts of the case;
• Identify the parties and explain each party's position;
• Outline the case's procedural history including any appeals;
• What is the legal issue in question in this case?
• How did the court rule on the legal issue of this case?
• What facts did the court find to be most important in making its decision?
• Do you agree or disagree with the court's decision? Provide an explanation for your reasoning either agree or disagree.

 

C12 Case Analysis 3 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Edwards

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Edwards

 

• Summarize the facts of the case;
• Identify the parties and explain each party's position;
• Outline the case's procedural history including any appeals;
• What is the legal issue in question in this case?
• How did the court rule on the legal issue of this case?
• What facts did the court find to be most important in making its decision?
• Respond to the following questions:
• Why was the Supreme Court unwilling to exclude contracts guaranteeing a fixed rate of return from the definition of security?
• Are mortgage notes securities when they are sold with a package of management services and a promise to repurchase the notes in the event of default?
• Do you agree or disagree with the court's decision? If you disagree, provide an explanation of your reasoning.

 

C12 Case Analysis 4- Awad v. Ziriax, et al, No. 10-6273

Awad v. Ziriax, et al, No. 10-6273 (10th Cir. 2012)

• Summarize the facts of the case;
• Identify the parties and explain each party's position;
• Outline the case's procedural history including any appeals;
• What is the legal issue in question in this case?
• How did the court rule on the legal issue of this case?
• What facts did the court find to be most important in making its decision?
• Respond to the following questions:
• Can a U.S. court enforce a clause in a contract specifying that Sharia law will apply?
• When, if ever, should a national court look to decisions of courts in other nations when interpreting its own nation's constitution?
•  
• Do you agree or disagree with the court's decision? If you disagree, provide an explanation of your reasoning.